AAs removed with SF

Forums: Index > Planning Forum > AAs removed with SF

Post

the first row (the stat AAs) was removed from the class AAs with sf, is it enough to flag them rfg or is there anything else that needs to be done? -- Vraeth 12:13, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, I think more than RfG would need to be done. We (I) don't want them showing up in the AA categories because they don't exist in-game anymore. -- lordebon 13:19, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

i was thinking the same, but i just didnt want to tag them with afd and remove them for good. thats why i thought its better to talk about it -- Vraeth 13:29, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Hmm the only problem is that the stat AAs are a little valid of you are speaking of the old Class AA lines .. like str and agi line and so on

It's maybe better to replace the AA information with a Text and the RfG on top so it's possible to say what it is now

-- ( Talk ) 21:58, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

i just noticed that Nightshade's Intelligence was deleted today. so is this the conclusion then? just delete these obsolete AAs? -- Vraeth 11:07, July 30, 2010 (UTC)

I am not completely aware of the expansion changes and how widespread they are. If you do not upgrade to SF then do the old rules still apply or are the changes to the AA lines, stat consolidation etc concidered a permanent patch that happened to coinside with the SF release? Kyllien 00:28, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

fundamental changes are permanent, and part of the GUs and not the expansions so its irrelevant if you have the expansion or not -- Vraeth 05:30, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

I'm tending to say remove the AA's since they are ain't coming back, but add a note at the talk page of each AA-tree that says the following 5 AA got removed with SF.

• name1 (str line) line starts now with newname1
• name2 (agi line) line starts now with newname2
• name3 (sta line) line starts now with newname3
• name4 (wis line) line starts now with newname4
• name5 (int line) line starts now with newname5

I could knock a template together so you have to write less for the comments. -- ( Talk ) 15:43, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

so whats the point of the {{rfg|}} tag then? isnt that used to mark articles that were part of the game, but not anymore, and wont come back? -- Vraeth 17:51, August 2, 2010 (UTC)