DoV Fabled Sets

Forums: Index > Planning Forum > DoV Fabled Sets

Post

I've been working on a page for the Destiny of Velious raid armor sets.

Right now, I've got a polished draft that's launch-ready in my personal sandbox, User:McJeff/Sandbox . But I thought it'd be prudent to bring it to the forums instead of just launching it.

The biggest problem with it right now is that not all of the Tier 2 items have been discovered yet. It's easy to presume that they'll follow the same naming conventions that the T1 and already-discovered T2 stuff have, but it's not fact until it's actually discovered - so I'm not sure what would be best to do there. Include notes that some stuff hasn't officially been discovered yet? Launch the page without the T2 Armor table?

The other problem is more cosmetic - I'm not crazy about how tall the tables are. It still seemed the best way to organize everything.

So that's about it. If anyone wants to help I totally don't mind if people edit it while it's in my sandbox. McJeff ^{(talk this way)} / _{(stalk this way)} 00:52, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

Looks like a good start. From everything I've seen the naming is very consistent so we should be fine there. If we had more horizontal space I'd say make each archetype a column rather than a row in order to cut down on the length, but thanks to wikia that's not much of an option. (On a side note, I'd ditch the width declaration... in wikia's skin the table is probably going to take up the full width that it can grab). Maybe if we dropped the repetative part (Gore-Imbued and Cruor-Imbued) and just listed things like Coif we could do the columns, that might work nice.

That might be a good option for the subclass table though -- rather than have T1/T2 as a row each they should fit with T1 and T2 as columns. It's tough to say at first glance since I've modded the wikia skin to remove their silly fixed width, but it looks like it would fit. At worst we might need to cosmetically drop the (Armor Set) from the visible part of the link. I'll try fiddling with it a bit tomorrow (or should I say later today, hehe) and look at it logged out to see how (bad) things look in wikia's skin. -- lordebon 04:55, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

I think this page is great, and that you should "launch" it. Not many people can find it in your Sand Box, and since there hasn't been any changes to the page in the last month, maybe is better to "launch" it, so that more people can find the page and then contribute on it. I am actually tempted to copy your page and "launchh" it, but I think you should get the credit for creating the page. Volvov70 11:36, May 28, 2011 (UTC)